Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich has a Master's in Public Diplomacy from USC Annenberg for Communication. She is an independent researcher and writer with a focus on U.S. foreign policy and the role of the lobby. Her articles have been published by several online publications. She is a public speaker. She is frequently interviewed by Russia TV.

View Latest Posts >>>

Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich: Iran Nuclear Deal Differences

Soraya: U.S and Tehran disagree over Sanctions lift.

by Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich

Excerpts:

Tehran accuses the U.S. of spinning the nuclear deal.

Russia is opposed to snap back inspections and phased out sanctions.

Russia is a UN Security Council member and is present in the meetings and I doubt would agree to the State Department’s version.

Iran was never in violation of the NPT.

Most importantly, we must think about (upholding) the International treaties.

International treaties are being held hostage by the west.

There has been a lot of interference inside Iran by Washington.  The nuclear issue is just an excuse to undermine the Islamic Republic and has very little to do with anything else.


Also see:

Truth Seeker: Outline of Iran Nuclear Deal Sounds Different From Each Side

 

Iran Nuclear Deal Differ in English and Farsi Versions

Iran Nuclear Deal Differ in English and Farsi Versions

 

 



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VNN, VNN authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. Notices

Posted by on April 6, 2015, With 0 Reads, Filed under Middle East. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

One Response to "Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich: Iran Nuclear Deal Differences"

  1. Debbie Menon  April 6, 2015 at 3:26 am

    “Time has come for international efforts to eliminate the Israeli arsenal of WMD”. Syria Foreign Ministry

    Deputy Foreign and Expatriates Minister Fayssal Mikdad said the only danger which poses a threat to the region is the Zionist entity, affirming that there is no justification to have doubt about this, except the Israeli acts, its allies in Europe and its tools in the region which circulate that there are other dangers.

    “After reaching a framework deal between Iran and p5+1 in Switzerland on the Iranian nuclear file which guarantees Tehran’s rights in using nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, it is natural to welcome such a deal because it will lead to easing tensions in the region,” Mikdad said in an article published on Lebanese al-Binaa newspaper on Saturday.

    He added that all have become confirmed that the only side responsible for violating the principles of nuclear non-proliferation is Israel and the western countries which offered their capabilities to build Israel’s arsenal of chemical and nuclear weapon.

    Mikdad went on to say that the cooperation showed by Syria and Iran in meeting the international community’s interests whether in relation to eliminating chemical weapons in Syria or to Iran’s coordination in the nuclear file confirms, once again, the true intentions of both countries which consider the use of such weapons an immoral matter that contradicts their religious values.

    “Time has come for the international efforts to eliminate the Israeli arsenal of weapons of mass destruction,” Mikdad said, adding that what encourages Israel to boost its weapon programs is the stance of some Arab regimes who connive with this entity.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network