Obama Administration Officials: No Coup In Egypt
by Debbie Menon
It is language.
You can say anything you like. Call it what you like and, yes, the ignorant and ill-informed will believe you if you say it forcefully and frequently enough, especially while standing in front of an altar, a flag or some such token of symbol of Truth, and Sincerity.
We have had many re-definitions; Richard Nixon on what constitutes a “crook,” and a criminal “conspiracy”.
Bill Clinton redefining “sexual” activity, and Tito Gonzalez and George Bush on defining “torture.”
Common sense, if such exists, should be able to help us discern the difference between a slug and a sunflower; advance and retreat, reduction and increase, crooks, liars and sages, sex and a handshake!
GEORGE Bush, Tito Gonzales, David Levin, Keith Olbermann, many others have had their chance to speak, and their words to say on waterboarding and “ torture; “we do not,” “…we do, but it is legal.” “It is not,” “It is…” etc.
If you’ve ever been dunked under water and held there by someone who you know does not like you and who doesn’t give a jot for your life or survival (I have not been), I would expect we would be able to discern the difference between a playful dunking in the swimming pool and an attempted drowning while tied to the end of a board.
If you call something which is not good by a different name, it may not become exactly good, but then, it is no longer “not good.”
Torture becomes legal, “creative interrogation”; kidnapping becomes “rendition.” C’mon! My common sense tells me better.
Words, and the reassignment of definitions to words. An overhaul of the English language to suit the expedient of the day, that’s all!
Keep them as ignorant and as uninformed as you can for as long as you can. And you can torture them with your own tortuous terms which can be made to sound as if they mean anything you want them to say. But it will hardly turn being slowly drowned on the end of a board into a swim meet, or diving event.
It would appear that “common sense” is not so common anymore. In fact, it’s becoming a rare, very rare, commodity throughout the world—particularly in North America.
An adjunct to Truth and Beauty, it is of no use in the politics of today’s world.
I expect a spade is a spade, but then, I would not be surprised if someone suddenly told me that a spade is a derogative racist term invented by us Muslim apologists to denigrate one of a different race, and was a racist remark, like Apartheid or Holocaust!
Don’t people read dictionaries anymore?
I remember when I was 10, sitting in my mother’s big “easy” chair by the window, reading from her big, thick red Webster’s. I never got all the way through it, it had no plot or storyline at all and was boring for the most part, but I enjoyed reading about words and what they meant.
I guess words don’t mean those things anymore. Maybe, in this world where individualism is so important, we can write our own definitions, and if someone doesn’t like them, then we can holocaust, apartheid, genocide, or just kill them all, ship them out or ban them from a web.
Or, we can brand them an anti-Semite and destroy their intellectual credentials and no one will ever listen to anything they ever say again.
Barb Weir is the pseudonym of a writer and social justice advocate in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Egyptian takeover not a “coup”; ketchup still a vegetable
If the military takeover in Egypt is a coup d’état, U.S. law requires the suspension of $1.5 billion in aid per year, second only to the more than $3 billion annual gift to Israel. If ketchup is not a vegetable, U.S. school meals may be violating nutritional guidelines.
In order to answer these questions, I consulted Professor I. Ben Lyon, chief lexicontortionist in the office of White House Press Secretary Jake Arney. Here is a transcript of our conversation:
Barb Weir: Professor Lyon, I’ve never heard of a lexicontortionist. What exactly do you do?
Lyon: I invent new definitions for old words. For example, I shrunk the definition of torture to almost nothing during the Bush administration. I also changed ketchup from a condiment to a vegetable. Or take the phrase “legitimate government”. It used to mean one that is elected through free and fair elections.
Barb Weir: What’s wrong with that?
Lyon: Unfortunately, a communist regime was elected in Chile through free and fair elections, as was the Hamas Islamic party in the last Palestinian elections. We therefore changed the definition of legitimate government to “one that is elected through free and fair elections and is acceptable to the U.S. and Israel”.
Barb Weir: What about coup d’état? I understand it has gone through some changes.
Lyon: Yes, it used to mean the overthrow of a government. However, the U.S. passed a law denying support to a regime that comes to power through a coup d’état. At that point it was taken to mean overthrow of a legitimate government, i.e. acceptable to the U.S. and Israel. That worked fine until Egypt.
Barb Weir: What do you mean?
Lyon: The Muslim Brotherhood not only came to power in Egypt through free and fair elections, but it agreed to be co-opted by the U.S. and Israel. They agreed to uphold all the agreements of the Mubarak government, maintain a friendly business climate for foreign corporations, keep good relations with Israel and even repress Palestinians.
Barb Weir: So what’s the problem?
Lyon: It’s Muslim, Barb. It encouraged and inspired Islamic movements in other places. Vilifying Muslims is a big part of U.S. and Israeli foreign policy, so they had to go. Unfortunately, that constituted a coup d’état even by U.S. standards, which meant suspending aid to a military government that the U.S. had encouraged and helped to seize power. That’s where I come in.
Barb Weir: What was your solution?
Lyon: I suggested changing coup d’état to cou d’état. The first is French for “overthrow of state” while the second means “neck of state”. If you look at a map, you’ll see that, unlike Thailand, Egypt has no neck, so there would be no requirement to suspend aid.
Barb Weir: Brilliant!
Lyon: I’m glad you think so. They actually opted to make no determination at all, and to avoid having to stop aid that way. Basically, they said, “We know it looks like a coup, but it isn’t if we don’t say so, and we’ve decided not to say so.” I don’t mind. At least ketchup is still a vegetable.
Her main focus are the US-Mid-East Conflicts. Her writing has been featured in several print and online publications in the Middle East. She is committed to exposing(AIPAC) the Israel Lobby's control of American policy for the Middle East. Control which amounts to treason by the Zionist Lobbies in America and its stooges in Congress, and that guarantees there can never be a peaceful resolution of the Middle East conflicts, only catastrophe for all, in the region and the world.
Her focus is Israel’s drift towards greater oppression of the Palestinian people; the political deceptions and crisis in Syria and Ukraine; the cold hard facts about America’s so-called ‘war on terror’ and grim future; countering the propaganda war towards Iran & Russia and calling attention to, the new, developing, promising, strategic alliances as a consequence.
Her mission is to inform and educate the public on issues of the US/Middle East conflicts that are unreported, underreported, or distorted in the Zionist ownedAmerican Media.
Her writing reflects the incredible resilience, almost superhuman steadfastness of the occupied and oppressed Palestinians, who are now facing the prospect of a final round of ethnic cleansing.
Her mission is to inform and educate internet viewers seeking unfiltered information about real events on issues of the US/Middle East conflicts that are unreported, underreported, or distorted in the American media.
Her purpose is to look at the current reality from a different and critical perspective, not to simply rehash the pro-US/Israel perspective, smoke and mirrors that has been allowed to utterly and completely dominate Mainstream discourse.
PS: For those of her detractors that think she is being selective and even “one sided,” tough, that is the point of her work, to present an alternative view and interpretation of the US-Israel-Middle East conflict, that has been completely ignored in mainstream discourse and denied the US public. Oh, and she is not Muslim or Palestinian and not married to one either! She is practicing Roman catholic.
Latest posts by Debbie Menon (see all)
- American current bi-party system is bankrupt - February 18, 2015
- Former Israeli Soldier Eran Efrati Lashes Out About The Occupation - February 14, 2015
- A wonderfully befitting homage to Anthony Lawson paid by his son - February 9, 2015
Posted by Debbie Menon on August 3, 2013, With 0 Reads, Filed under Americas, Asia, Bahrain, China, Egypt, Europe, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Oceana, Oman, Palestine, United Kingdom, World News, Yemen. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.