Joint Chiefs of Staff Confirmation Hearing


Editor’s note : Very revealing and educational, if not downright nauseatingly embarrassing the way the Senate Chief Zionist and Netanyahu Rep, Lindsey Graham, interrogated General Dempsey. 

Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.)

Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and JCS Vice Chair Adm. James Winnefeld, Jr. appear before the Senate Armed Services Committee during a reappointment confirmation hearing. Both are seeking second terms.  

C-Span — The Senate Armed Services Committee heard from General Martin Dempsey and Admiral James Winnefeld, both of whom had been nominated to remain in their senior military posts on the Joint Chiefs of Staff. During one tense exchange on Syria with Senator McCain, General Dempsey did not rule out the use of force in Syria, but declined to give his own opinion. 

Other topics included Afghanistan, Syria, Egypt, Iran, Russia and sex assaults in the military. 

Also see:

Defense News Report: McCain Plans To Block Dempsey’s JCS Chair Nomination

 

Editor’s note : For those who did not see the unaired Saturday Night Live skit on Chuck Hagel’s confirmation, wish they’d aired it — very critical of the Senate’s deference to Israel:

 

Saturday Night Live – Dress Rehearsal C-Span Chuck Hagel Hearings

IFrame

VNN

A Media Info Site at Veterans Today Network
Since 2011, VNN has operated as part of the Veterans Today Network; a group that operates over 50 plus media, information and service online sites for U.S. Military Veterans.

Latest posts by VNN (see all)

Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VNN or any other VNN authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Posted by on 3:12 pm, With 0 Reads, Filed under Americas, Asia, Bahrain, China, Egypt, Europe, Heroes, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Military, Oceana, Oman, Palestine, Support the Troops, Syria, United Kingdom, World News, Yemen. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

3 Responses to "Joint Chiefs of Staff Confirmation Hearing"

  1. John  July 22, 2013 at 12:50 pm

    I take it that VNN is not interested in giving a platform to Democrat Senator Levin’s opinions on Syria nor a platform for the opinions of the pro-war Senate Armed Services Committee.

    Their intention is to highlight the fact that during McCain’s section from 49:45 to 58:40 in the C-Span video, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey refused to comply with Senator McCain’s demand that General Martin state that he is for direct U.S. military action against Syria or to at least state his personal opinion on direct U.S. military action against Syria.

    General Dempsey advised McCain that direct US military action in Syria could make worse a situation that has left dead nearly 100,000 people and sent refugees pouring into neighboring countries.

    In the first portion of Senator Graham’s section from 1:40:38 to 1:48:05 in the C-Span video, Zionist Senator Graham reads Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s words and essentially demands that General Martin and Admiral Winnefeld agree with them. Like good servants, they do.

    • Debbie Menon  July 22, 2013 at 11:26 pm

      Thanks John. Your clarification is helpful.

    • Debbie Menon  July 23, 2013 at 12:37 am

      In a letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee, Army General Martin Dempsey outlined what limited military options the US has if it decides to increase involvement in the Syrian civil war – warning of costs that could reach $1 billion a month.

      Dempsey, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff and the highest-ranking American military advisor, wrote that a no-fly zone over Syria would cost the US between $500 million and $1 billion a month to maintain, and may be ineffective because the Syrian army relies on artillery, not air support, to fight the insurrection.

      While the Senate Armed Services Committee are weighing their options, US President Barack Obama will continue with the plan to arm Syrian rebels after several congressional concerns were alleviated, Reuters quoted officials as saying. “We believe we are in a position that the administration can move forward,”House of Representatives Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers said.

      The House and Senate intelligence committees gave a green light to send CIA weapons shipments to opposition fighters in Syria, Washington Post reported, adding that the US will use the money already in the CIA’s budget and transfer it to the Syria operation. The plan was announced last month by the Obama administration and involves giving small arms and ammunition to some of the 1,200 groups of Syrian rebels, some of which have known affiliations with al-Qaeda.

      The infrastructure is already in place and arms are expected to start coming in the next several weeks.

      Dempsey’s letter, dated July 19 and made public July 22, was written in response to a contentious meeting with Senator John McCain, who accused Dempsey of withholding information during a previous meeting with the Senate Armed Services Committee. McCain has threatened to place a hold on Dempsey’s nomination for another two-year term as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs unless the general provides more details on hypothetical military action.
      Scenarios outlined by Dempsey included: Train, Advise and Assist the Opposition; Conduct Limited Stand-off Strikes; Establish a No-Fly Zone; Establish Buffer Zones; Control Chemical Weapons.

      The chairman warned that any decision would need to be weighed carefully and treated as “no less than an act of war.”

      McCain and the other Senate Armed Services Committee members previously pressed Dempsey to consider the “costs, benefits and risks associated with training and arming vetted elements of the Syrian opposition? In your view, could such action alone be sufficient to adequately build the military capability of the moderate opposition in Syria and create the necessary conditions for the administration’s stated policy objective – Bashar Assad’s departure and a negotiated solution to the conflict in Syria – to succeed?”

      Dempsey pushed lawmakers to consider the long-term consequences any military action would mean.

      “Risks include the loss of US aircraft, which would require us to insert personnel recovery forces,” he replied. “It may also fail to reduce the violence or shift momentum because the regime relies overwhelmingly on surfaces fires – mortars, artillery and missiles.”

      He reminded the committee that virtually every scenario “could also average well over one billion dollars a month” and could provide aid to al-Qaeda or other radical groups. Along with this came a warning of no guarantee that Syrian chemical weapons would be put under an American safeguard.

      “Should the regime’s institutions collapse in the absence of a viable opposition, we could inadvertently empower extremists or unleash the very chemical weapons we seek to control,” he wrote. “It would be inappropriate for me to try to influence the decision with me rendering an opinion in public about what kind of force we should use.”

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS WEEK