What sounds too good to be true, usually is!
by Debbie Menon
The so-called “Revolutions” or “Arab Spring” as they are better known, looked good, sounded good, and were literally, too good to be true. It was all scripted, planned and pre-packaged, and PR managed it very well.
Egypt was, and still is, ripe for a popular revolution. The only problem there is that every and anyone in Egypt who is in a position of control or leadership, belongs to Israel or is so dependent on the US and their various aid programs to pay the rent and put water in the swimming pool, that there was no one to lead the Revolution (Did I not mention early on that this “revolution” seemed strangely devoid of spokesmen or leadership?)
Most of the “spokesmen” we heard from were people standing in front of cameras with microphones or pedants sitting in London and New York, telling us what was “happening”. These corrupted “leaders” include Omar Sulieman, all of the Generals and, yes, Herr El-Barradai! (Soros’s Man in Cairo) Whatever their personal attitude, all of them are corrupted, bought and paid for, and not one of them his own man.
Mubarak fell out of favor because he either would not or could not actively support a war with Iran. So, it was a case of replace him, if possible, with someone else who would or could do the job, or destroy Egypt as an effective and functional State.
Balkanizing Egypt was in the books eventually anyway in accordance with the Hertzl/Yinon plans and, although Egypt was helpful as a gatekeeper to Gaza and a stepping stone to Iran, it was not an essential element in their wars with Iran and Palestine. So, in accordance with Israeli philosophy, if you cannot control it, destroy it. Either way, they win.
Allowing a mob reaction to occur, and designating it a “revolution” was risky! But, not a risk beyond immediate recovery if anything had gone wrong. The tanks were there, and the smiling soldiers all had fully loaded ammo belts and magazines with which to blast the flowers out of the gun muzzles.
Which was all essential, because big, leaderless mobs and “revolutions” somehow have a tendency to get out of control and some folks take them seriously. But, without effective and organized leadership, which must include a ready-made post-revolutionary plan and organization to immediately drop into place and fill the vacuum, install and establish a reform government, it would not stand a chance of success… and it did not.
It was a safe move to simply relax and “allow” a massive popular movement. It took very little to encourage the mobs… they were primed by 30 years of oppression and ready… just a few infiltrated “activists”and we had hundreds of thousands of disorganized cheerleaders out parading and shouting.
The Army played an important role by showing up with flowers in the muzzles of their guns and friendly smiles on their faces (but fully loaded ammo belts), as ordered. How convenient, and how out of character for one of the most repressive Armies in the world! Too good to be true!
If the new Government or whomever they install does not do the job, then pull American Military and civil Aid and payoffs out, and the entire state collapses and becomes just another dysfunctional, non-threatening Arab country without leadership or influence like Lebanon and Palestine. Omar, El-Barradai, Hosni and all of the Generals move to Switzerland or Israel and retire.
Re-read Hertzl and Yinon.
Think about this “Arab Spring” and the way it happened… think about the public relations aspect… how it was hyped in the MSM Press and Infotainment Industries and presented to the world. Me thinks Huffington Post, the Daily Beast, the Guardian, et al are all members of the team, with assigned tasks, or they are innocent dupes, “just doing our job, y’know!” Publishing WH Pressroom releases. Helen Thomas is not there anymore.
All the highest ideals of Democracy, wrapt up in the faces of all of those people in the crowd! The dreams and the hopes of all those newly-weds at the Egyptian protests! Remeber them ? Now, where in hell did they get, and how did they manage all of that finery and those beautiful and innocent looking newly-weds amidst all that chaos, fire and smoke? This took some real doing, I can tell you! And, no revolutionary in his right mind takes a virgin bride to a “revolution!”
Lady Liberty of the Nile!
Too good to be true! It never had a chance without proper pre-and post revolutionary organization and planning. And, it was delivered to you wrapped in the bunting and banners of Freedom, Liberty and Justice for the Oppressed and all. This was an excellent piece of work. Something on the order of the old Metro-Goldwyn-Mayor epics!
When all the “revolutions” are over, they will tell us the “people” have spoken, and the people have “won,” and we are going to be exposed to another major epic production when the Unholy Alliance turns Hasbara (hebrew for propaganda) and the Disinformation Sector of the USG loose on dressing this pig in silk and delivering her to our door as the new Middle Eastern bride in lipstick! Lady Liberty!
What sounds too good to be true, usually is!
For Thierry Meyssan, the Turkish people are not protesting against Recip Tayyeb Erdogan’s autocratic style, but against his policies; in other words, against the Muslim Brotherhood, of which he is the mentor. What started on Taksim Square is not a color revolution over a new building project, but an uprising that has spread across the entire country; in short, it is a revolution that calls the “Arab Spring” into question.
The Turkish uprising is rooted in the inconsistencies of the Erdogan government. The latter—after having billed itself as “Muslim Democrat” (based on the “Christian Democratic” model)— suddenly revealed its true nature with the advent of the Arab Spring “color revolutions.”
In terms of domestic and foreign policy, there is a before and after the volte face. The previous stage involved the infiltration of institutions. The aftermath has been characterized by sectarianism. Before, Ahmed Davuto?lu’s theory of “zero problems” with Turkey’s neighbors took center stage. The former Ottoman Empire seemed to be coming out of its slumber and returning to reality. After that, the opposite happened: Turkey fell out with each of her neighbors and went to war against Syria.
The Muslim Brotherhood
Piloting this shift is the Muslim Brotherhood, a secret organization that Erdogan and his team have always been affiliated to, despite their denials. Even if this shift is subsequent to the one involving Qatar—the financier of the Muslim Brotherhood—it bears the same implication: authoritarian regimes that claimed to be foes of Israel suddenly act like close allies.
It is important to remember that the label “Arab Spring” given by the West is a deception to make people believe that the Tunisian and Egyptian governments were overthrown by a mass movement. While there was a popular revolution in Tunisia, its goal was not to change the regime, but to achieve economic and social changes. It was the United States, not the street, that ordered Zinedine el Abidine Ben Ali and Hosni Mubarak to step down. Then it was NATO that toppled and lynched Muammar al-Gaddafi. And it is again NATO and the GCC that have fueled the attack against Syria.
Across North Africa—with the exception of Algeria—the Muslim Brotherhood have been placed in power by Hillary Clinton. Everywhere, Turkish communications advisors are on board, courtesy of the Erdogan government. Everywhere, “democracy” was a facade which allowed the Brothers to Islamize firms in exchange for embracing the pseudo-liberal capitalism of the United States.
The term “Islamize” reflects the rhetoric employed by the Brothers, not reality. The Brotherhood intends to control the privacy of individuals based on principles which are outside the scope of the Quran. It calls into question the role of women in society and imposes an austere lifestyle without alcohol or cigarettes, and without sex…at least for others.
Over the past ten years, the Brotherhood has stayed under the radar, leaving the transformation of public education in the hands of the sect run by Fethullah Gülen, of which President Abdullah Gül is a member.
Although the Brotherhood flaunts its hatred for the American way of life, it thrives under the protective wing of the Anglo-Americans (UK, USA, Israel) who have always been able to use its violence against those who resisted them. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had appointed to her cabinet her former “body woman,” Huma Abedin (wife of former Zionist Congressman Anthony Weiner), whose mother Saleha Abedin presides the women’s division of the Brotherhood. It was through this channel that Clinton stirred up the Brotherhood.
The Brothers purveyed the ideology of Al-Qaeda, through one of their members: Ayman al-Zawahiri, the organizer of President Sadat’s assassination and currently the leader of the terrorist organization. Al-Zawahiri, like Bin Laden, has always been an agent of U.S. services. Although officially listed as a public enemy, from 1997 to 2001 he met regularly with the CIA at the U.S. Embassy in Baku in the context “Operation Gladio B,” as testified by former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds .
A progressive dictatorship
During his imprisonment, Erdogan claimed to have broken with the Brothers and to have quit the party. Then, he got himself elected and gradually imposed a dictatorship. He ordered the arrest and incarceration of two thirds of the generals accused of involvement in Gladio, the secret network under U.S. influence. In addition, he put behind bars the highest number of journalists for an individual counry. This fact has been obscured by the Western media, unwilling to criticize a NATO member.
The army is the traditional custodian of Kemalist secularism. However, after the September 11 attacks, senior officers were concerned about the totalitarian drift of the United States, and made ??contact with their counterparts in Russia and China. To nip these unwelcome initiatives in the bud, certain judges pointedly reminded them about their historical ties with the U.S.
If, like in any other profession, journalists can be rascals, the world’s highest incarceration rate is indicative of a policy: intimidation and repression. With the exception of Ululsal, television turned into an official eulogy, while the press followed the same path.
“Zero problems” with its neighbors
The foreign policy of Ahmet Davutoglu was equally laughable. After seeking to tackle the unresolved problems left over from the Ottoman Empire one century earlier, he tried to play Obama against Netanyahu by organizing the Freedom Flotilla to Palestine . However, less than two months after Israel’s act of piracy, he accepted the international commission of inquiry created to cover it up and resumed in secret his collaboration with Tel Aviv.
As a token of the cooperation between the Brotherhood and Al-Qaeda, the Brotherhood had placed on the Marvi Marmara al-Mahdi Hatari, the second in command of Al Qaeda in Libya and a likely British agent .
How did Turkey squander not only a decade of diplomatic efforts to restore its international relations, but also its economic growth? In March 2011, she participated in the NATO operation against Libya, one of its major economic partners. With Libya devastated by the war, Turkey lost its market. At the same time, Ankara embarked on a war against neighboring Syria, with whom a year earlier she had signed a trade liberalization agreement. The impact was swift: the growth in 2010 was 9.2%, in 2012 it fell to 2.2% and continues to fall .
The rise to power of the Muslim Brotherhood in North Africa went to the Erdogan government’s head. By brandishing his Ottoman imperial ambition, he disconcerted the Arab public to begin with, and then turned the majority of his people against him.
On one hand, the government is funding Fetih 1453—a film that gobbled up an astronomic budget for the country—which is supposed to celebrate the conquest of Constantinople, albeit historically flawed. On the other hand, it attempts to ban the most popular television series in the Middle East, The Sultan’s Harem, because the truth does not project a peaceful image of the Ottomans.
The real reason for the uprising
In the present context, the Western press has focused on specific details: a housing project in Istanbul, ban on late-night sales of alcholol, or statements encouraging population growth. All this is true, but it doesn’t add up to a revolution.
By showing its true nature, the Erdogan government has cut itself off from the population. Only a minority of Sunnis can identify with the backward and hypocritical programme of the Brothers. As it happens, about 50% of Turks are Sunni, 20% Alevi (that is to say Alawites), 20% are Kurds (mostly Sunni), and 10% belong to other minorities. It is statistically clear that the Erdogan government can not hold out against the uprising that its own policies helped to ignite.
By overthrowing him, the Turks would be solving not only their own problems, but would also be putting an end to the war against Syria. I have often pointed out that the war would stop the day one of its foreign sponsors exits the scene. This will soon be the case. Thus, the Turkish people will also halt the Brotherhood’s expansion. Erdogan’s fall foreshadows that of his friends; Ghannouchi in Tunisia and Morsi in Egypt. It is in fact most unlikely that these artificial governments, imposed via rigged elections, can survive their powerful sponsor.
Thierry Meyssan is a French intellectual, founder and chairman of Voltaire Network and the Axis for Peace Conference. Professor of International Relations at the Centre for Strategic Studies in Damascus. His columns specializing in international relations feature in daily newspapers and weekly magazines in Arabic, Spanish and Russian. His last two books published in English : 9/11 the Big Lie and Pentagate.
Posted by Debbie Menon on June 11, 2013, With 0 Reads, Filed under Americas, Australia & Oceana, China & Asia, Europe, Middle East, World Affairs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.