Editor’s note: Innocent individuals vs. guilty collectives:
Is the New Order taking charge, or is the world simply falling apart at the seams; literally, geologically, and socially?
There comes a time when every individual however innocent of personal wrong-doing or inactivity in the face of wrong-doing, who has taken advantage of or benefited from the wrong-doings of his family, tribe, cult, nation or culture, must pay the price for the collective wrong-doing of that family, tribe, cult, nation or culture, whether he actively participated in their crimes or not.
Having accepted the advantage and benefit of his personal identity with that group, he has no complaint, and cannot plead innocent, when he is called to account for the behavior of that group, participant or not.
As I have said before, revolutions usually destroy more than they develop, and few of them result in much more than new names, old games, amidst a lot of new ruins and destruction.
Evolution is natural… Revolution is man-made.
Man is the one singular, sole, contaminant, a pollutant on the face of the earth, which has become the greatest threat to all living matter and animals on the planet, including himself.
Reading history and about the human condition,is development upon which is based personal growth and maturity, the sum of which is wisdom.
A Farewell Address by Philip Giraldi, is worth re-visiting.
It is obvious from what Raimondo says “Hardball pitching” have not catapulted them into the first rank of commentators and news sites. No one wants to face the real “hardball pitchers,” the likes of Helen Thomas and Alison Weir, Mearsh & Walt, Sniegoski, Sabrosky, Jeff Gates and James Petras. They play for keeps, and take no prisoners. Helen Thomas was an accurate news reporter. She also acknowledged that in the industry, there are just certain truths which you just cannot say in print. But, she called them like she saw them, and she don’t work there no more. There is a message and a lesson there somewhere.
It is commitment and writing such as Philip Giraldi’s, Justin Raimondo and other hardball pitchers like them, which illustrates and illuminates the loss of the values upon which the myth of America, the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave, was founded which will eventually drive home to the “American” public what has happened to their “dream,” and who is responsible for their loss, which may eventually stir them to action of some sort to bring it to an end… if anything will!
“At times, I imagine I’m caught up in some nightmarish perpetual loop, the same scenario being played over and over again, with no power to stop it – or to wake up. We live, increasingly, in a Bizarro World version of reality, where up is down, the guilty are praised and the innocent – the truth-tellers – are punished. And therein lies the lesson I personally have learned from this war, whose tenth anniversary we “celebrate” with endless op eds and ex post facto rationalizations: my task is that assigned to Sisyphus, condemned by the gods to roll a stone up a hill only to see it fall back down the other side in perpetuity” writes Justin Raimondo.
Antiwar.com, March 18, 2013
Ten years after the invasion of Iraq, the war criminals are still at large. Saddam Hussein is dead and buried, but the cabal that lied us into war is still around – and not only that, they are mocking us from their podiums in the media, justifying and obscuring their crimes. Here is former Bush speechwriter David Frum declaring he was right all along – if only:
“If we’d found the WMD, it would have been different. If we’d kept better order in Iraq after the overthrow of Saddam, it would have been different. If more Iraqis had welcomed the invasion as we expected, it would have been different. If the case for the war had been argued in a less contrived and predetermined way, it would have been different.”
Ah, “but it wasn’t different,” continues Frum: “Those of us who were involved – in whatever way – bear the responsibility.” So what have been the consequences suffered by Frum – as opposed to the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who were killed and maimed, their lives and country destroyed? What price has Mr. “Axis of Evil” paid that is in any way comparable to that exacted from the 5,000 Americans killed and tens of thousands horribly wounded? Why none, of course. There he is, on CNN, in the Daily Beast, pontificating in his new role as a “moderate” Republican.
A similarly soft landing has been enjoyed by Richard “Cakewalk” Perle, Frum’s literary collaborator and ubiquitous television talking head in the run up to the invasion. Perle landed a cushy position at
Neocon Central the American Enterprise Institue and a platform from which to claim “Who, me?”
The next door down at AEI is the office of Paul Wolfowitz, former Undersectary of Defense, whose Pentagon policy shop labored long and hard in that great Lie Factory to manufacture “evidence” of Saddam’s WMDs. It is illegal for a government official to do what Wolfie and his fellow neocons, like Douglas Feith, did in the run-up to the war – that is, create “intelligence” out of thin air, and pass it off as a casus belli – and yet they are all free as birds, and much better off materially for having committed their crimes. Feith is today ensconced at the Hudson Institute, yet another well-funded neocon thinktank. He recently authored – with Abram Shulsky, who headed up the Pentagon’s “Office of Special Plans,” a key cog of the Lie Machine – a series of reports on how to fight the “war of ideas” against “radical Islam.”
Feith and his co-conspirators not only refuse to own up to authoring the greatest military disaster in American history, they are “proud” of it, as Dick Cheney recently proclaimed. A government investigation into whether Feith and his fellows deliberately palmed off false “intelligence” to justify the Iraq invasion was quashed. To this day, not a single US government official has been held accountable, and the pro-war pundits – who spent over a decade relentlessly agitating for the war – are in their same perches, war-birds screeching for the destruction of Iran.
There is much talk of the “lessons” the war has supposedly taught us, and there is a significant debate about this, but what’s clear is the lesson learned by the architects of this war: that being a neocon means never having to say you’re sorry.
Having served as publicist-in-chief of the War Party has done nothing to dim Bill Kristol‘s career: from his subsidized lair at the Weekly Standard, he commands the respect – and the money – of major conservative politicians and donors. Every Sunday he pontificates on Fox News, denouncing any and all who question the wisdom of perpetual war as “isolationists.” What “lesson” has this neoconservative Rasputin learned from a war that, by any standard, was a disaster for the United States and Iraq? Only that it was good for business – his business, that is, which is warmongering.
Conversely, let us look at what happened to a once prominent figure who was right about Iraq, who said there was no evidence of Iraqi WMDs, and that we were going to war based on a lie: Scott Ritter, former UN weapons inspector, who originally was a hardliner and came to see that the case for war with Iraq was a tissue of fabrications. He wrote a book, Target Iran, claiming that the Israel lobby was the chief driver of the Iraq war bandwagon, and is trying to do the same when it comes to Iran. After a right-wing campaign in which he was smeared as an agent of the Iraqi government, and years of struggling to support himself – as a New York Times Magazine profile put it, “he wasn’t so much an academic or a journalist as he was a peace activist, something for which think tanks and networks had little use” – Ritter was lured into an internet encounter in an over-18 chat room by a police decoy masquerading as an underage girl and charged. Last year he was convicted and sentenced to jail. Ritter believes he was targeted and entrapped. Given the enemies he’s made, it’s a plausible scenario.
What lesson has he learned from the Iraq war? Go visit him in jail and ask him.
As for the rest of the country: at this point, it’s hard to say. There are, to be sure, rumblings of real dissent: the rise of Rand Paul in the Republican party, the debate that is taking place on this tenth anniversary of the Iraq Mistake, the overwhelming grassroots opposition likely to be awakened by a possible US strike on Iran. There is a certain war weariness, yes, but one wonders how quickly another terrorist attack on American soil might dissipate that mood.
In the years, months, and days before the war, we here at Antiwar.com warned Americans – and the world – of what the outcome would be. The costs, in troops, treasure, civilian deaths – and the cost to America’s credibility in the world – would all, in the end, add up to a devastating loss. We were right about that – but where has that gotten us? While we haven’t exactly suffered Ritter’s tragic fate, being right about such a major issue hasn’t catapulted us into the first rank of commentators and news sites, now has it? Indeed, we find ourselves repeating what we said, lo those many years ago, except now the subject is Iran, not Iraq – and the same liars are repeating the same lies on a daily basis.
At times, I imagine I’m caught up in some nightmarish perpetual loop, the same scenario being played over and over again, with no power to stop it – or to wake up. We live, increasingly, in a Bizarro World version of reality, where up is down, the guilty are praised and the innocent – the truth-tellers – are punished. And therein lies the lesson I personally have learned from this war, whose tenth anniversary we “celebrate” with endless op eds and ex post facto rationalizations: my task is that assigned to Sisyphus, condemned by the gods to roll a stone up a hill only to see it fall back down the other side in perpetuity.
Justin Raimondo is the editorial director of Antiwar.com. He is the author of An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard (Prometheus Books, 2000), Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement (ISI, 2008), and Into the Bosnian Quagmire: The Case Against U.S. Intervention in the Balkans (1996). He is a contributing editor for The American Conservative, a senior fellow at the Randolph Bourne Institute, and an adjunct scholar with the Ludwig von Mises Institute.
He writes frequently for Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture.
Gordon Brown’s Shocking – “It was the right decision”
Her main focus are the US-Mid-East Conflicts. Her writing has been featured in several print and online publications in the Middle East. She is committed to exposing(AIPAC) the Israel Lobby's control of American policy for the Middle East. Control which amounts to treason by the Zionist Lobbies in America and its stooges in Congress, and that guarantees there can never be a peaceful resolution of the Middle East conflicts, only catastrophe for all, in the region and the world.
Her focus is Israel’s drift towards greater oppression of the Palestinian people; the political deceptions and crisis in Syria and Ukraine; the cold hard facts about America’s so-called ‘war on terror’ and grim future; countering the propaganda war towards Iran & Russia and calling attention to, the new, developing, promising, strategic alliances as a consequence.
Her mission is to inform and educate the public on issues of the US/Middle East conflicts that are unreported, underreported, or distorted in the Zionist ownedAmerican Media.
Her writing reflects the incredible resilience, almost superhuman steadfastness of the occupied and oppressed Palestinians, who are now facing the prospect of a final round of ethnic cleansing.
Her mission is to inform and educate internet viewers seeking unfiltered information about real events on issues of the US/Middle East conflicts that are unreported, underreported, or distorted in the American media.
Her purpose is to look at the current reality from a different and critical perspective, not to simply rehash the pro-US/Israel perspective, smoke and mirrors that has been allowed to utterly and completely dominate Mainstream discourse.
PS: For those of her detractors that think she is being selective and even “one sided,” tough, that is the point of her work, to present an alternative view and interpretation of the US-Israel-Middle East conflict, that has been completely ignored in mainstream discourse and denied the US public. Oh, and she is not Muslim or Palestinian and not married to one either! She is practicing Roman catholic.
Latest posts by Debbie Menon (see all)
- American current bi-party system is bankrupt - February 18, 2015
- Former Israeli Soldier Eran Efrati Lashes Out About The Occupation - February 14, 2015
- A wonderfully befitting homage to Anthony Lawson paid by his son - February 9, 2015
Posted by Debbie Menon on March 19, 2013, With 0 Reads, Filed under Causes, Civil Liberties, Corruption, Foreign Lobbies, Foreign Policy, Government, Legislation, Life, Police State, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.