Munich Security Conference breaks Iran-US ice

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, left, and Iran’s Ali Akbar Salehi, pose for a photo in Munich, Germany, on Saturday.

“We have no red line for bilateral negotiations when it comes to negotiating over a particular subject …” Salehi said in Munich.


by Kaveh L Afrasiabi

Asia Times

CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts – Iran and the United States are on the verge of a historical opportunity to repair their frozen relations and thus reverse the spiral of conflict spiral that for years has dominated their interactions. It is the right thing to do and at the right time, given the fact that more often than not past opportunities were lost simply because one side or the other was not “ready”.


BERLIN (Reuters) – Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said on Monday he saw U.S. Vice-President Joe Biden’s offer this weekend of bilateral dialogue between their two countries as a sign of a change in approach to Tehran by Washington.

Fortunately, today’s situation is different and that is a cause for cautious optimism in light of positive statements from US and Iranian officials, particularly by US Vice-President Joseph Biden who, while attending the 49th Munich Security Conference, announced US’s readiness to engage in serious dialogue with Iran, a move that was immediately reciprocated by Iran’s Foreign Minister Ali Akba Salehi, who termed Biden’s remark as a welcome “step forward.”

“We have no red line for bilateral negotiations when it comes to negotiating over a particular subject …”, Salehi said in Munich. “If the subject is the nuclear file, yes, we are ready for negotiations but we have to make sure … that the other side this time comes with authentic intention, with a fair and real intention to resolve the issue.”

At the same time, reacting to Biden’s remark that the window for diplomacy is not open forever and that all options are still on the table, Salehi rightly branded as “contradictory” the US’s intention to talk “but on the other side you use this threatening rhetoric that everything is on the table… these are not compatible with each other.We are ready for engagement only when it is on equal footing.”

In Tehran, Salehi’s position was backed by, among others, Alaedin Boroujerdi, a powerful member of parliament (Majlis) and chairman of the Majlis Committee on National Security and Foreign Policy, who reiterated Salehi’s concerns about the need for the US to prove it has “sincere intentions” and also clarified that the decision to hold talks with the US is on the shoulder of the Supreme National Security Council (headed by Saeed Jalili).

Coinciding with Salehi’s Munich trip, where he met for the first time with the leader of Syrian opposition, was Jalili’s trip to Damascus and his high-profile meeting with embattled Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, expressing full support for Bashar and denouncing Israel’s recent air raid on Syria.

In three weeks, Jalili will be in Kazakhstan for the next round of nuclear talks with the “P5+1″ nations (the United Nations Security Council’s permanent five members plus Germany), that is, shortly after President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address (scheduled for February 14). The big question is, of course, whether or not the White House is really ready for a new round of “Iran engagement?”

Questions about US’s strategy toward Iran


According to Mehdi Mohammadi, a former political editor of conservative daily Kayah, who is advising Jalili on the nuclear issue, the US must change its strategy toward Iran if it wants a successful nuclear negotiation with Iran. But, then again, what exactly is US’s strategy toward Iran?

In a nutshell, US’s Iran strategy boils down to two things: containment of Iranian power and the deterrence of Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Concerning the latter, outgoing US secretary of state Hillary Clinton in her final speech at the Council on Foreign Relations prioritized the Iran nuclear threat and reiterated that US is firmly committed to “preventing Iran from achieving a nuclear weapons capability”.

The problem with this statement is that Iran has already reached the threshold of nuclear capability by virtue of mastering the complete nuclear fuel cycle, and this is a fait accompli that has yet to be factored and fully integrated into a realistic US strategy toward Iran. (For more on this see Afrasiabi US think tank fuels the Iran nuclear crisis, Asia Times Online, January 25, 2013). Incredibly, the US’s narrative on nuclear Iran consistently fails to make the crucial distinction between potential and actual capability and to draw the related policy ramifications from this necessary distinction.

As a result, if the US’s intention of talks is to insist on the suspension of the uranium enrichment program, then it is a futile effort that is doomed to fail in light of Iranian leadership’s clear signals that they will not stop the enrichment activity under any circumstance.

What Tehran may be willing to consider is a voluntary ceiling on the uranium enrichment, a temporary suspension of 20% enrichment, and the like; that is, certain compromises that do not infringe on Iran’s “inalienable nuclear rights” enshrined in the articles of Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

These could be complemented with efforts to enhance Iran’s cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and, perhaps, the re-adoption of the intrusive Additional Protocol. Tehran has also stated its readiness to register the Supreme Leader’s edict against nuclear weapons at the United Nations, in order to prove that it is not simply a religious ruling but rather the national Iranian policy.

Together, these Iranian steps would provide “objective guarantees” regarding the peaceful nature and intent of Iran’s nuclear program, the fact that Iran would not misuse its nuclear capability by crossing the line and turning actual its present latent or potential weapons ability. [1]

But will these steps suffice to lift the Western sanctions on Iran? And is the US ready to reciprocate Iran’s moves by stepping away from the coercive diplomacy that has become second nature to Washington?

Another question is what role or influence US allies, such as Britain or France, will have in the coming talks?

The reason that last question matters is that the Conservative government of British Prime Minister David Cameron is apt to play a spoiler role, given its close ties with Israel, and this may explain why the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Cathereine Ashton, in her Munich speech kept up the emphasis on “political and economic pressure” so that “Iran understands”.

Ashton and the White House are somewhat out of sync with each other and this raises the issue of connection between bilateral US-Iran talk and multilateral nuclear talks, the fact that the latter has the distinct potential and can set back the former. In turn, this raises the need for the US to insulate its Iran policy from third-party influence as much as possible, focusing on its own net of interests – and the areas of mutual interest and shared concerns with Iran, such as the future of Afghanistan.

Indeed, this is a litmus test of US foreign policy in the administration of Barack Obama’s second presidency and it will not be long before we know the results.

Editor: Debbie Menon

Dr. Kaveh Afrasiabi has taught political science at Tehran University, Boston University, and Bentley College. Afrasiabi has been a visiting scholar at Harvard University, UC Berkeley, Binghamton University, Center For Strategic Research, Tehran and Institute For Strategic Studies in Paris.


Editor’s note : A must watch candid Gwenyth Todd in Press TV two part documentary below.  Adviser to the US Navy Gwenyth Todd (former US National Security Council staffer in the Clinton and first Bush administration). If Gwenyth Todd’s account is true, she is owed thanks  for thwarting a plot to start a war on Iran.  Also See: Washington Post story on Todd, titled : Why was a Navy adviser stripped of her career?

The Woman Who Stopped the War (Part 1).wmv

By  Gordon Duff



The Woman Who Stopped the War Part 2.

Short URL:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VNN or any other VNN authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Apply for Jobs on Now
Apply for Jobs on Now
Austins School of Spa Technology
Austins School of Spa Technology
slow aging
What Price Gold

Posted by on Feb 4 2013, With 0 Reads, Filed under Americas, Asia, Bahrain, China, Editors' Picks, Egypt, Europe, Global, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Oceana, Of Interest, Oman, Palestine, Syria, United Kingdom, Yemen. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


To post a comment, you must login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with our site and post your comment.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Legal Notice

Comments Closed

2 Comments for “Munich Security Conference breaks Iran-US ice”

  1. If one wants to build a bridge between the US and Iran, go get some BRICS

    Now for those who think I may be talking about an Israeli 30 foot high apartheid wall made out of concrete BRICKS, I am not. The BRICS to which I am referring is the new ‘power block’ of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Does it compare to the bully brigade of the US, UK, France, Germany and the sycophantic little followers like Australia, Canada and others of lesser importance, doing what they are told by NATO, ANZUS and any other number of groups of letters? Make up your own letters as it matters little. The big bully has a UN Security Council veto and pulls the strings, even though morally and financially bankrupt but with lots of paper money being printed, 16.5 trillion at last count.

    Whatever little killing club one belongs to, it matters little because Netanyahu, the leader of the world’s #1 psychotic state, Israel, likened to the Third Reich, will have the last say. After all he controls through his minions, the US Congress, the Senate, the media, finance, military and communication and has his spies posing as staffers, up and down the corridors in Washington. Why, they have even held the role of Chief of Staff to the US President. Hard to get higher than that. Well placed aren’t they?

    So Netanyahu is an accomplished leader of men, leading the US here, there and everywhere by the nose. The US seems to love it. Just this week they have allowed a group of Zionist supporting Senators to humiliate, degrade, embarrass and ridicule another Senator in a confirmation circus. No one seems to care that their interest in NOT the US but that same psychotic state, a middle east killing machine, hiding behind the skirts of America and its anachronistic veto. An example…..

    The UN General Assembly Resolution 194 has been affirmed by the UN over 110 times since its introduction in 1948 with universal consensus, except for Israel and the U.S. It says in part “Palestinian refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date”. One is forced to ask if the UN is a worthless organisation or is 65 years still not an early enough ‘practical date’

    So do we need another ‘power block’. Yes, if only to make the rest of the world demand some accounting. As well, building a worthwhile relationship with Iran will at least make the bullies think twice about throwing their weight around, dancing to the dictates of pariah states who, through their devious and illegal dealings over forty years are now in a position to exert undue pressure on decent peoples, everywhere.

    UN General Assembly Resolution 194 has been affirmed by the UN over 110 times since its introduction in 1948 with universal consensus, except for Israel and the U.S. It says in part “Palestinian refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date”. One is forced to ask if the UN is a worthless organisation or is 65 years still not an early enough ‘practical date’? Is there a better example of the evil of Israel and the subservience of the US.

    So, in typical fashion, we will see the likes of Jewish sycophant Biden (remember him at the annual AIPAC grovel?) saying that everything is on the table, diplomatic-speak for watch your back. Great ice-breaker but so typical.

    Don’t expect too much as the editorial comment, “that Iran and the United States are on the verge of a historical opportunity to repair their frozen relations and thus reverse the spiral of conflict” was probably written by a supreme optimist.

    If there has been no settlement in Palestine in 66 years, with the US voting it down 110 times, 66 UN Resolutions ignored by Israel, this little deviation is just that, a deviation to serve some purpose, possibly put in place by the feckless Ms Clinton before she waddled off into oblivion, permanently, hopefully.

    Go get ‘em, BRICS.

Comments are closed


Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE


  1. CNN plummets to lowest ratings in 23 years
  2. Hospice Cat Brings Comfort To Veterans At The End Of Their Lives
  3. The Bush Institute Talks with General Pace and General Chiarelli about Post 9/11 Veterans
  4. The Berlin Wall Just Another Brick in The Wall
  5. On Veterans Day, You Can Help Crowdsource World War I Diaries
  6. Free dental work, meals and other deals for veterans on Veterans Day
  7. Obama Lame Duck in a NeoCon Congress
  8. Top Ten Movies to Watch on Veterans Day
  9. Adelson and Saban Try To Out-Hawk Each Other
  10. Veterans, Their Oath, Our Freedoms
  11. Another Fake Bin Laden Story — Paul Craig Roberts
  12. VA to host annual National Veterans Small Business Engagement
  13. Why is Veterans Day 2014 on Tuesday? Holiday history and more
  14. Community College Hiring
  15. Will the blackmail of British Jewish funders backfire?
  16. Republican victory and Iran N-talks
  17. Russia’s Vulnerability to EU – US Sanctions and Military Encroachments
  18. VetCap Surges During National Veterans Small Business Week
  19. GET OUT: Auburn Veterans Day Parade, antiques and collectibles show and more happenings
  20. Canada’s ‘Remembrance Day’: righteous or rancorous?
  1. Debbie Menon: Classic Don Nash!
  2. Don Nash: Well if it wasn’t for Barack Hussein Obama, the Berlin Wall would never have come down. No, really....
  3. DaveE: Believe me, those “delightful Americans” like me (I’m constantly being called...
  4. rexw: Obama in reality, has been a lame duck president after six months into his term as a compliant...
  5. rexw: The most relevant comment above is as follows… “It began Saturday night, when the first task Netanyahu...

Apply for VA Home Loan Now!

Military Veterans Radio