Hagel and the Hawks

Hagel:  “Let me clear something up here if there’s any doubt in your mind. I’m a United States Senator. I’m not an Israeli senator. I’m a United States Senator. I support Israel. But my first interest is, I take an oath of office to the constitution of the United States. Not to a president, not to a party, not to Israel.”



Marsha B. Cohen

Lobe blog


Chuck Hagel hasn’t even been nominated for Secretary of Defense and yet rumors aboundthat he is a frontrunner for the job. The volume of the squawking from hard-line hawks opposing his nomination reveals much about the way the neoconservative echo chamber operates.

Morris Amitay, a former executive director of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), founder of Washington PAC, and author of the 2008 ultimatum, Why Jews Must Vote for John McCain“, opined to Adam Kredo of the Washington Free Beacon that Hagel becoming Secretary of Defense “would be a very unwise and disastrous choice for U.S. policies and activities regarding the Middle East.” Asked to rate Hagel’s views on Israel, Amitay responded, “He’s probably the worst.”

ZOA President Morton Klein

“He is one of the most hostile critics of Israel that has ever been in the Senate,” harrumphed Morton Klein, President of the Zionist Organization of America to The Algemeiner, a right-wing (and virulently anti-Obama) Jewish news site.

Noah Silverman of  the Republican Jewish Coalition wrote that Hagel’s nomination would be a “gut check” for pro-Obama Israel supporters, gleefully pointing to a litany of complaints about Hagel refusing to sign letters of support on a variety of Israel-related topics compiled by the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC). Silverman also referenced the rantings of Jennifer Rubin, Right Turn blogger at the Washington Post, who dusted off and recycled some anti-Hagel canards from her files, in particular an anti-Hagel screed she wrote for Commentary in 2010.

“Washington Post writer Jennifer Rubin symbolizes America’s media depravity” — Stephen Lendman

What do Rubin and the hyper-pro-Israel, franti-Iran-spinmeisters find so distressing and dangerous about Hagel? And how justified are their accusations? Rubin notes that “In 2009, Hagel signed a letter urging Obama to open direct negotiations with Hamas, a position so extreme that Obama hasn’t (yet) embraced it.”

In fact, the said letter was the brainchild of Henry Siegman, the Executive Director of the American Jewish Congress for nearly three decades, an ordained Orthodox rabbi, a US army chaplain awarded a bronze star during the Korean War and currently President of the US/Middle East Project (USMEP). He also authored a 2006 article for the New York Review of Books stating that negotiating with Hamas was Israel’s last chance for peace. Hagel’s nine “extreme” bi-partisan co-signatories were two veteran presidential national security advisers, Brent Scowcroft and Zbigniew Brzezinski; economic adviser Paul Volcker; JFK’s special counsel Ted Sorensen; former House International Relations Committee chairman Lee Hamilton, a Democrat; former Bush #41 UN ambassador Thomas Pickering, co-chair of USMEP; World Bank president James Wolfensohn; Carla Hills, a former US trade representative during the Ford administration; and another former Republican senator, Nancy Kassebaum Baker.

Hagel’s anti-Israel stance is epitomized by a (rather fuzzily cited) Hagel quote dug up by Rubin, which she apparently considers damning: “Let me clear something up here if there’s any doubt in your mind. I’m a United States Senator. I’m not an Israeli senator. I’m a United States Senator. I support Israel. But my first interest is, I take an oath of office to the constitution of the United States. Not to a president, not to a party, not to Israel.”

On Iran, Rubin wrote in 2010: “Hagel was one of two senators in 2004 to vote against renewal of the Libya-Iran sanctions act. (“Messrs. Hagel and [Richard] Lugar … want a weaker stance than most other senators against the terrorists in Iran and Syria and the West Bank and Gaza and against those who help the terrorists. They are more concerned than most other senators about upsetting our erstwhile allies in Europe — the French and Germans — who do business with the terrorists.”)

The unidentified parenthetical quote she used in both her Washington Post and Commentary attacks on Hagel was lifted from a 2004 New York Sun editorial disparaging Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry for his adherence to “Lugar-Hagelism”– a foreign policy stance that regards direct negotiations with antagonists as being far more productive and efficacious than sanctions:

  …what is Lugar-Hagelism?

One indicator came on July 24, 2001, when the Senate voted 96 to 2 to renew the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act. The act helps deny Iran and Libya money that they would spend on supporting terror or acquiring weapons of mass destruction. The two senators who opposed the measure? Messrs. Lugar and Hagel.

Another indicator came on November 11, 2003, when the Senate, by a vote of 89 to 4, passed the Syria Accountability Act authorizing sanctions on Syria for its support of terrorism and its occupation of Lebanon. Mr. Hagel – along with Mr. Kerry – didn’t vote. Mr. Hagel met in Damascus in 1998 with the terror-sponsoring dictator, Hafez Al-Assad, and returned to tell a reporter about the meeting, “Peace comes through dealing with people. Peace doesn’t come at the end of a bayonet or the end of a gun.”

Kerry and Hagel weren’t alone in abstaining on the Syria Accountability Act vote. Sen. Joe Lieberman didn’t cast a vote either. More to the point, Hagel’s stance on Syria, expressed to the Council on Foreign Relations in 2005, has proven itself astute, even prescient:

The United States should be very cautious about supporting the collapse of the Assad regime. That would be a dangerous event, with the potential to trigger wider regional instability at a time when our capacity to help shape a desired regional outcome is very limited. Our objective should be a strategic shift in Syria’s perspective and actions that would open the way to greater common interests for the countries of the region.

Furthermore, it would appear that attacks from the right on Hagel might also apply to Kerry: “Mr. Kerry has a lot in common with Mr. Hagel; Mr.Hagel is also a decorated Vietnam veteran who is now a multimillionaire. Mr. Kerry has a lot in common with Mr. Lugar, too; they are both former Navy officers. Mr. Lugar has been in the Senate for 27 years, while Mr. Kerry has been there, and serving on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that Mr. Lugar now chairs, for 19 years.”

Ironically, during the 2012 election cycle, Lugar — who the New York Sun dubbed “Ayatollah Lugar” for his skepticism about the wisdom of Iran sanctions — received $20,000 from NORPAC, a leading pro-Israel political action committee in New Jersey, more than any other candidate in the 2012 election cycle. The Jewish Week explains why pro-Israel groups lamented Lugar’s defeat in the Indiana GOP primary and his absence from the Senate:

Lugar, the top Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, consistently backed defense assistance for Israel and in the 1980s championed freedom for Soviet Jews. But he was also known for pushing a more active U.S. approach to brokering Middle East peace than that favored by much of the pro-Israel lobby, and he preferred to move ahead cautiously on Iran sanctions….

Israel advocates and GOP insiders explained that Lugar represented a breed of lawmaker who pro-Israel groups see as valuable to their cause and disappearing: One who reaches across the aisle.

“Lugar wasn’t actively pro-Israel, but he wasn’t anti either,” said Mike Kraft, a staffer on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in the 1970s and 1980s who now is a consultant on counterterrorism and writes for a number of pro-Israel websites and think tanks. “But generally losing a good, balanced, thoughtful guy on foreign policy is a real tragedy. It weakens the American political system.”

Try telling that to Jennifer Rubin.

 Dr. Marsha B. Cohen is an independent scholar, news analyst, writer and lecturer in Miami, FL specializing in Israeli-Iranian relations. An Adjunct Professor of International Relations at Florida International University for over a decade, she now writes and lectures in a variety of venues on the role of religion in politics and world affairs.


Related Posts:

Short URL:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VNN or any other VNN authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Apply for Jobs on Now
Apply for Jobs on Now
Austins School of Spa Technology
Austins School of Spa Technology
slow aging
What Price Gold

Posted by on Dec 15 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under Americas, Asia, Bahrain, China, Civil Liberties, Corruption, Cost to the US, Editors' Picks, Egypt, Europe, Expert Viewpoints, Foreign Policy, Global, Government, Iran, Israel, Israel Lobby in Action, Israeli Spying, Legislation, Middle East, Oceana, Oman, Palestine, Politico, Syria, United Kingdom, Yemen. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


To post a comment, you must login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with our site and post your comment.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Legal Notice

Comments Closed

1 Comment for “Hagel and the Hawks”

  1. “Dr. Marsha B. Cohen is an independent scholar, specializing in Israeli-Iranian relations.”

    Now that must make her unique. A scholar living in Miami, independent, Israeli-Iran relations, is there any such thing? The role of religion in politics?
    Well, now we are getting somewhere. She might be real, after all

    And finally, to top it all off, Chuck Hagel stating that he is a US Senator and not an Israeli Senator.
    What planet is he on? How does one differentiate? Stating it does not make it so or give it credibility. With the reign of the Super PAC’s in full swing, let’s just wait until the next election gets under way.

    Well, he has yet to survive a New York Times campaign against him or any of the other 90% of US media outlets have yet to draw a bead on him. You just can’t talk like that in today’s America, controlled as it is from Tel Aviv. Doesn’t worry the people particularly. They wouldn’t know or care who he is. Bigger fish to fry….jobs, financial security, medical bills, schooling and staying alive.
    This is America, 2012

    Well, I like the sound of Hagel. But the rhetorical Obama, a man not known for taking risks of any kind, achieving anything of value in 48 months or ruffling feathers of any colour may prefer another Jewish fellow- traveller with the blatant Zionist stooge qualities of Ms Clinton, soon jumping off the boat after four years of propping up the Israeli cabal, in Israel and Washington. She will be well remembered for her vicious comment, on more than one occasion, designed to frighten the Likudists, that the Israel housing expansion on to Palestine land, yet again, was “not helpful”.. Powerful stuff.

    Not helpful to what, do you ask?

    Why the “Peace Process”. That stage-managed charade, somewhat subdued of late.

    Obama should forget Hagel and appoint some real American like Cantor. May be the only way he can get some sleep.

Comments are closed


Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE


  1. Opening the Gates to World War III
  2. Israel – America’s Biggest Frenemy
  3. Delusional US ‘Group Think’ on Syria, Ukraine
  4. Acting El Paso veterans affairs director addresses veteran’s concerns
  5. More brain trauma counseling funds needed at Veterans One Stop
  6. The Strange World of NSA Mind Control
  7. Biden in Kiev on US Regime-Change Victory Tour
  8. Veterans Say Loyola Recovery Foundation Closure is Vital Loss
  9. V.F.W. Goes Gender Neutral, Recognizing Female Veterans
  10. Veterans May Gain Easier Access To Medical Marijuana
  11. Veterans affairs position proposed to Board of Trustees
  12. Will the Iran Deal-Wreckers Prevail?
  13. ‘International law is being applied highly selectively, when it comes to Iran’
  14. Moment of Truth — Iran and Obama
  15. Washington plays Russian roulette
  16. Veterans’ moms to Congress: Boost suicide prevention
  17. Veterans face another battle: Paying for college
  18. Specialty Food Distributor Immediately Hiring
  19. Imagine – Mr. Putin Takes Center Stage at G20 Summit
  20. All-Out War in Ukraine: NATO’s ‘Final Offensive’
  1. rexw: “It would seem that the Russian government has underestimated Washington’s mendacity and overestimated...
  2. Old Jules: Veterans Days haven’t been anything but an insult for an awfully long while.
  3. Old Jules: Yeah but the upside is when they come home they get to commit suicide at a rate of one-per-hour when the...
  4. Keyser Soze: “In politics, stupidity is not a handicap.” ― Napoleon
  5. Chris Williams: Good to see Bob Carr speaking plainly about the situation. Of course, this hasn’t been an...

Apply for VA Home Loan Now!

Military Veterans Radio