Denuclearization and Sanctions on Israel
The UN general assembly has overwhelmingly approved a resolution calling on Israel to open its nuclear program for inspection.
by Debbie Menon
Calls for de-nuclearization of Israel –The United Nations General Assembly is pressing Israel to reveal its nuclear arsenal. Israel has lashed out against the overwhelming approval of the resolution, which calls for international inspectors to be allowed to examine its atomic program. Its foreign minister said the vote was meaningless. Israel also rejected a UN-backed conference on a nuke-free Middle East. Israel denies it has nuclear weapons – but refuses to provide proof that it doesn’t.
Russia TV broadcast a program on Israel’s recent refusal to open its arsenal to UN nuclear weapons inspectors.
RT’s Paula Slier tried to lift the veil surrounding Israel’s atomic program. The segment featured IRmep research on Benjamin Netanyahu’s past role illegally smuggling nuclear triggers from the United States. The story first surfaced in FBI files released [to IRmep] at the end of last year, from a seven-year investigation which began in 1985 and in Joseph Gelman’s tell-all book “Confidential.” They show how a network of front companies connected to the Israeli Defense Ministry smuggled nuclear triggers out of the United States to Israel.
Nuclear Israel: The secret that is not
Grant F. Smith, Research Director at IRmep.org, joins James Corbett to discuss the secret Israeli espionage program that smuggled nuclear materials out of the United States to help start the Israeli nuclear program in the 1960s. They go over the declassified documents tying Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu (PDF) to a nuclear technology smuggling ring targeting the U.S. in the 1980s, and explore Smith’s book, Divert!: NUMEC, Zalman Shapiro and the diversion of US weapons grade uranium into the Israeli nuclear weapons program.
- Israeli Illicit Procurement of Krytron Tubes – New Case Study from Department of War Studies/Proliferation
[Associated Press, guardian.co.uk] The UN resolution, approved by a vote of 174 to six with six abstentions, calls on Israel to join the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) “without further delay” and open its nuclear facilities to inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Those voting against were Israel, the US, Canada, Marshall Islands, Micronesia and Palau.
Resolutions adopted by the 193-member general assembly are not legally binding but they do reflect world opinion and carry moral and political weight. And the resolution adds to pressure on Israel as it faces criticism over plans to increase settlement in the West Bank, a move seen as retaliation for the assembly recognizing Palestinian statehood.
Israel refuses to confirm or deny possessing nuclear bombs though it is widely believed to have them. It has refused to join the non-proliferation treaty along with three nuclear weapon states: India, Pakistan and North Korea.
Israel insists there must first be a Middle East peace agreement before the establishment of a proposed regional zone free of weapons of mass destruction. Its rivals in the region argue that Israel’s undeclared nuclear arsenal presents the greatest threat to peace in the region.
While the US voted against the resolution, it voted in favour of two paragraphs in it that were put to separate votes. Both support universal adherence to the NPT and call on those countries that aren’t parties to ratify it “at the earliest date”. The only no votes on those paragraphs were Israel and India.
The vote came as a sequel to the cancellation of a high-level conference aimed at banning nuclear weapons from the Middle East. All the Arab nations and Iran had planned to attend the summit in mid-December in Helsinki, Finland, but the US announced on 23 November that it would not take place, citing political turmoil in the region and Iran’s defiant stance on non-proliferation. Iran and some Arab nations countered that the real reason for the cancellation was Israel’s refusal to attend.
Just before Monday’s vote, the Iranian diplomat Khodadad Seifi told the assembly “the truth is that the Israeli regime is the only party which rejected to conditions for a conference”. He called for “strong pressure on that regime to participate in the conference without any preconditions”.
Israeli diplomat Isi Yanouka told the general assembly his country had continuously pointed to the danger of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East, singling out Iran and Syria by name. “All these cases challenge Israel’s security and cast a dark shadow at the prospect of embarking on a meaningful regional security process,” he said.
“The fact that the sponsors include in this anti-Israeli resolution language referring to the 2012 conference proves above all the ill intent of the Arab states with regard to this conference.”
The Syrian diplomat Abdullah Hallak told the assembly his government was angry the conference was not going to take place because of “the whim of just one party, a party with nuclear warheads”.
“We call on the international community to put pressure on Israel to accept the NPT, get rid of its arsenal and delivery systems, in order to allow for peace and stability in our region,” he said.
The conference’s main sponsors are the US, Russia and Britain. The British foreign office minister Alistair Burt has said it is being postponed, not cancelled.
Pressure is building in Europe from civil society calling for trade sanctions on Israel. Officially, the European Union views Israeli settlements in the Palestinian territories as illegal. But that hasn’t stopped the EU from doing booming trade with the outposts. Now a group of European NGOs have banded together to demand an end to the practice.
Our UK correspondent, Stuart Littlewood informed us, Foreign Secretary William Hague is coming under increasing pressure in Parliament from MPs. Benjamin Peter James Bradshaw a British Labour politician who has been the Member of Parliament for Exeter since 1997, is quoted as telling Hague: “The Netanyahu government are completely impervious to condemnation or summoning of ambassadors; it’s time for action. Uncharacteristically, you dodged earlier questions about trade with the illegal settlements. Will you now take the lead in Europe by implementing a ban on all trade with them?”
Duncan John Hames a British Liberal Democrat politician and MP since 2010, in response to Hague’s condemnation of Netanyahu’s recent defiance to continue the ‘illegal settlements activity,’ observes “ We have been here before, and he must grow weary of repeating to the Israeli Government his condemnation of illegal settlement activity. Given the importance of Europe as a market for Israeli goods and services, which European Ministers shy away from putting economic muscle behind our protestations, can he assure the House that he is not one of them?”
On the one side, the official position of the United States, UK and the European allies continues to be “pressuring” Israel and “sympathizing” with the Palestinian Authority to get on with the prospects of “peace”and the establishment of a Palestinian state side by side with Israel.
On the other side, Netanyahu is supposedly under so much international pressure, even by the United States, to give up on the plans to expand those “vitally needed” Jewish settlements, that any cooperation on his part to bend backwards and allow the peace negotiations to proceed, entails superhuman effort and sacrifice on his and the Zionist state’s part, which deserves ample appreciation and rewards in every imaginable way! And remember, the Zionists aren’t going to be risking anything in playing along with this charade.
In the background, however, we all know, and that “we” includes the United States government (not the American people, of course), the Europeans, the Palestinians and also the Israelis, and everyone else in between, that pushing for a “Two States Solution” is no more than plans to perpetuate a futile myth that only works to the Zionists’ myopic advantage to further marginalize the Palestinians and their dreams and legitimate aspirations, and to postpone the inevitable ultimate goal of a One State Solution.
Short URL: http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/?p=219391