JOIN VNN COLUMNIST TEAM | SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTER
VETERANS NEWS NOW ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER | FORUM
|

New York Times Opposes Palestinian Self-Determination

Jodi Rudoren is NewYork Times Jerusalem bureau chief

Dismissiveness defines longstanding editorial policy. Palestinians have no friend in Times Square.

 

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

Longstanding NYT articles, op-eds, and editorials are notoriously one-sided for Israel. Palestinian rights don’t matter, only Jewish ones.

Life in Occupied Palestine harshness goes largely unreported. Crimes of war and against humanity are ignored. An earlier If Americans Knew report explained “highly disturbing patterns” of distorted, one-sided coverage.

Little changed from then to now. In February 2012, Jodi Rudoren became Times Jerusalem bureau chief. Like earlier ones, she’s Jewish. A previous article quoted Alison Weir asking “(w)ho is Jodi Rudoren?”

Previously she reported on domestic issues. It’s unclear what she knows about Israel/Palestine. She admits having little regional knowledge. She hopes to be a fast learner. Her marching orders are clear.

She’s uncomfortable addressing Israeli torture, murder, and other lawless policies. At best she says some call West Bank settlements “controversial.” International law calls them illegal. No ambiguity exists.

Early in her tenure, she connected with David Ha’ivri. He’s an extremist settler rabbi. He’s involved with Jewish Defense League founder Meir Kahane’s Kach group.

Kahanism is known for racist, ultranationalist, terrorist policies. Israel, America, EU nations and Canada declared Kach a terrorist organization. Kahanists call Arabs enemies of Jews and Israel.

Times editors bear full responsibility for pro-Israeli bias. On November 4, their editorial headlined “Palestinians at the UN, Again.” The title alone expresses arrogance and dismissiveness.

“With peace negotiations at an impasse since 2008 and unlikely to resume any time soon,” it said, “the Palestinians have only one diplomatic card left — their status at the United Nations — and once again they are trying to play it.”

 

Fact check

On and off for nearly four decades, so-called “peace” talks were stillborn from inception. Illusion masks an Israeli/Washington partnership intolerant of peace.

Israeli and US leaders don’t negotiate. They demand. Palestinians get nothing but take-it-or-leave it diplomacy. Conflict resolution isn’t possible because Palestinians have no legitimate peace partner.

Privately, Netanyahu calls talks a waste of time. Going through the motions assures institutionalized injustice. Times editors don’t notice or care.

“Last year, the Palestinian Authority toyed with submitting an application for full United Nations membership, but backed off in the face of overwhelming opposition from the United States and Israel.”

Now they plan to seek “nonmember observer state” status. They’ll likely get it. “It is not a move that will do anyone any good. It will not change facts on the ground, and it will come at a cost.”

“Israel and the United States say unilateral moves like these by the Palestinians violate the 1993 Oslo accords, which were intended to pave the way to a ‘final status agreement’ within five years.”

“And it is clear that a negotiated deal is the only way to ensure the creation of a viable Palestinian state and guarantee Israel’s security.”

 

Fact check

Previous articles explained that Palestinian statehood was established on November 15, 1988. At the time, the PLO adopted the Palestinian Declaration of Independence. It’s official and binding. Palestine satisfies all essential criteria for sovereign independence and full de jure UN membership.

On May 11, 1949, General Assembly Resolution 273 recommended UN membership for Israel. On November 5, 1949, it was officially granted. It was conditional on its government accepting and implementing Resolutions 181 and 194.

On November 29, 1947, the General Assembly passed Resolution 181, the Palestine Partition Plan.

It granted 56% of historic Palestine to Jews (with one-third of the population) and 42% to Palestinians.

It designated Jerusalem international city (a corpus separatum – separate body) under a UN Trusteeship Council. It called for an Independent Arab state by October 1, 1948.

It asked “all Governments and peoples to refrain from taking any action which might hamper or delay the carrying out of these recommendations.”

It called for the Security Council to be empowered with “the necessary measures as provided for in the plan for its implementation.”

Israel’s 1948 “War of Independence” intervened. On May 14, 1948, a Jewish state was proclaimed. It’s on stolen land. It’s on 78% of historic Palestine.

International law affirms the universal right of return. It’s not negotiable.

UN Resolution 194 (December 1948) said “refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage which, under the principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the governments or authorities responsible.”

The General Assembly affirmed the right of return 135 or more times. Residents everywhere outside their native lands for any length of time have similar rights. Diaspora Palestinians have no fewer ones than others.

They’re not negotiable. International law affirms them. They’re binding and won’t change. Oslo Accord provisions represented unilateral Palestinian surrender. Negotiating terms were vaguely defined.

Timelines and outcomes weren’t specified. Israeli officials obstruct and delay. Concessions aren’t made. They never will be.

Official policy reflects occupation harshness and land theft. It’s hard-wired and unchanged. Negotiations accomplish nothing. Times reports don’t explain.

Perhaps as an afterthought, its editorial admitted that Netanyahu refuses serious compromise. Uniting with Avigdor Lieberman suggests “even more hard-line” policies ahead.

The Times shamelessly endorsed Obama. It did so for the wrong reasons. It ignored nearly four years of unprincipled leadership. It said, “Whatever chance exists of a new American peace initiative after the election is likely to vanish if Mitt Romney wins.”

Implied is that Obama’s reelection holds the best chance for Israel/Palestinian conflict resolution. Ignored is why no progress occurred during his first term.

He rejects Palestinian self-determination. He won’t accept full or partial UN membership. He’s one-sidedly pro-Israel. Rhetoric alone separates him from Romney. Both represent rogue governance.

The Times also rejects Palestinian statehood. It does so by ignoring what’s existed for 24 years. Dismissiveness defines longstanding editorial policy. Palestinians have no friend in Times Square.


Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.  His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”

http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html

Short URL: http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/?p=217652

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VNN or any other VNN authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Education
Get Your Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now
Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now
Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now
Austins School of Spa Technology
ME Online
slow aging
What Price Gold


Posted by on Nov 8 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under Americas, Asia, Editors' Picks, Egypt, Europe, Global, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Oceana, Palestine, United Kingdom. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

COMMENTS

To post a comment, you must login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with our site and post your comment.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Legal Notice

Comments Closed

2 Comments for “New York Times Opposes Palestinian Self-Determination”

  1. It was good to see the ‘fast check’ details again. No matter how many times you see it in print it still highlights the fact that the UN, driven by the dollars from the US, stage managed the whole affair. Those dollars are not around any more but Israel still uses the American veto as its own. That’s a plain fact. Also, one cannot forget the billions that find their way into Netanyahu’s coffers to continue those acts that have marked him as an inhumane Zionist, through and through, a latter day Hitler. Even Hitler didn’t illegally occupy any country for sixty years.

    As for the New York Times, the newpaper of Jewish Record, recording the news as Jews want to see it and as American keep buying the paper, so they musn’t care either. After all, with 90% oif the media in the hands of Zionists, it really is a wonder that they can even get the sports results right. If this apology for an honest newspaper ever had any ethics, it was a long time ago. But feeding the Zionist pap daily to anyone who will read it was a long term plan by the early architects of Israel’s expansion into the stolen Middle East, all with the approval of compromised Presidents since Truman. Gutless wonders, with the exception of Carter, trying hard to make amends for his country’s shortcoming for decades as a democratic country.

    So we shouldn’t ever expect any change from this position. Regarding the New York Times with any degree of respector credibility has long since passed. The people will get the message one day, hopefully, but never from their pages.

  2. I guess this all depends on your definition of “self determination.” If you mean the Jewish definition, the right to determine your destiny using ethnic cleansing, genocide, terrorism, extortion, brutality, larceny, propaganda, lies etc. etc. then the NYT is a FEARLESS promoter of self-determination. For the Jews at least.

Comments are closed

 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE

WHAT'S HOT

  1. Window Replacement Experts Hiring Today!
  2. Home Automation Company Hiring
  3. The Crocodile Tears of the Press Corps Crying: Freedom!
  4. Miko Peled # Zionism Must Go #Free Palestine, End the Occupation
  5. Mainstream media steps up anti-Russia propaganda on Ukraine
  6. Chile files lawsuit against Netanyahu for ‘crimes against humanity’
  7. 40 Holocaust survivors condemn ‘massacre’ of Palestinians, call for BDS against Israel
  8. Washington Sabotages Russian/Ukrainian Summit
  9. The Monopoly of the Government Education Cartel
  10. Transference of Evil: Netanyahu, a Creature without Morality or Mercy
  11. Henry Siegman, Leading Voice of U.S. Jewry, on Gaza: “A Slaughter of Innocents”
  12. The End of Liberal Zionism
  13. School program aims to help veterans
  14. Vietnam Veterans get a warm welcome home in Pigeon Forge
  15. Northern California Beverage Company Hiring Today
  16. Pioneer in Tech Industry Hiring!
  17. Alan Hart: On course for Holocaust II…..?
  18. The Mainstream Media, ISIS, and Iraq War Déjà Vu
  19. Rania Masri gives Barack Obama a lesson on the meaning of ‘barbaric’
  20. Obama Buggers Europe: Sanctions Deepen the Recession
  1. Mrs Edweena: ITS ABOUT TIME! I am a native indian and many native Indians stand in solidarity with Palastine. Its...
  2. tg: great courage! we need more of it on this planet!
  3. tg: p.s. HUH??? “According to international humanitarian law, a military strike is illegal if it kills...
  4. tg: so hopeful that other government leaders are standing up to the archons in israel!!! and the former also should...
  5. Gaza: Thanks to Mr. Hugo Gutierrez for standing up for Justice. We hope Netanyahu and other Israeli criminals will be...

Apply for VA Home Loan Now!

Military Veterans Radio

Archives