Romney’s Foreign Policy: About Face or Two-Faced?

Listening to this “kinder and gentler” Romney, two questions came to mind. Was all this a tactical ploy to sway undecided voters? Or was this the candidate’s declaration of independence from his neo-conservative advisers (three-quarters of whom are George W. Bush alumni)?


by James Zogby


During the last few weeks of this presidential campaign, I have become terribly confused listening to Mitt Romney address America’s foreign policy challenges.

I have followed Romney’s every word for almost two years now, and I simply don’t recognize the guy who spoke at Virginia Military Institute on October 8th or the one who showed up to debate President Obama last week.

Since the beginning of this long campaign, Romney has given ten foreign policy addresses. At every turn he has positioned himself as a severe critic of the Administration, condemning the president for “diminishing American leadership” and “betraying the trust that allies place in the United States.” Taking his cue from his bevy of neo-conservative advisers, Romney has appeared to embrace their tenets and even conflated their projection of American exceptionalism with elements of his own Mormon creed. His message has been that “America must lead through strength” and use its “great power to shape history.”

And so it has been baffling to witness the sudden transformation that now sees Romney largely agreeing with President Obama’s approach to several areas and while feigning sharp criticism in others, still fundamentally agreeing with current policy. When he lamented the absence of Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations (after just recently dismissing the entire effort as hopeless) and then offered such benign pronouncements as “we can’t kill our way out of this mess” or “we don’t want another Iraq, we don’t want another Afghanistan,” I became thoroughly unsettled.

Listening to this “kinder and gentler” Romney, two questions came to mind. Was all this a tactical ploy to sway undecided voters? Or was this the candidate’s declaration of independence from his neo-conservative advisers (three-quarters of whom are George W. Bush alumni)? Since Romney has also selectively veered away from many of his other “severely Conservative” views during the last few weeks of the campaign, I tend to believe that it is more of a crass tactical move than an assertion of independence.

In describing Romney’s effort at a “latter day make-over,” President Obama has coined the word “Romnesia” suggesting that the candidate may have forgotten the positions he embraced throughout the campaign. I tend to disagree. I don’t think Romney has forgotten a thing. I think he’s counting on the fact that his base knows the game that’s afoot and is willing to give him space to maneuver. The projection of the “new Romney” is directed at those Americans who are only now tuning in to the presidential contest and being introduced to the candidate for the first time. Romney is hoping that they will get to know him in his newly minted moderate incarnation. He is, likewise, hoping that some undecided voters who have heard him before will not recall the Romney of the primaries and believe that this “kinder and gentler” version is the one running for president.

I found it interesting that some non-partisan commentators remarked after the debate that both candidates seemed, at times, a bit off stride. It was no wonder. Romney has been playing a part for years now. Once dismissed as the seemingly moderate Governor of a liberal state, he was dismissed by the religious right and not trusted by the new GOP with its Tea Party activists and neo-conservative brain-trust. And so Romney remade himself into the Conservative darling. Back in 2008 when this transformation began, I didn’t know what was more unbelievable — that Mitt Romney had in fact become a conservative or that conservatives really believed that he was a conservative.

He embraced his conservative identity to such a degree that in his now infamous taped off-the-cuff conversation with donors, he rather comfortably elaborated on how compatible his hard-line views were with the party’s new mainstream. And so I don’t doubt for a minute that adopting this new moderate posture has a bit disconcerting to candidate Romney. Cynics sometimes say that in politics “the best actor wins.” Becoming a different person and feeling comfortable with the part may have been too much of a stretch for Romney.

For my way of thinking the act was too cute by half. I’ve heard of candidates changing their positions on critical issues over a period of years. They sometimes even make a convincing case about the evolution of their views on same-sex marriage, or abortion, or global warming. But to make changes in one night or two weeks, without offering any explanation, is a bit too much to bear or trust.

I, therefore, understand the president being caught a bit off stride. He had prepared to debate the candidate whom we had all come to know for the past few years. Even Senator John Kerry, who had taken the Romney part in the president’s debate preparation, expressed his surprise at much of what Romney said. Kerry remarked that these weren’t the positions they had prepared to contest, nor was this the candidate they had prepared to debate.

The Mitt Romney who showed up on debate night was a different person. The questions for voters will be: for which Mitt Romney are they being asked to vote? And should he win, which Mitt Romney would show up for work?

Original source: Huffington Post

James Zogby is President, Arab American Institute; and author, ‘Arab Voices’

Short URL:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VNN or any other VNN authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Apply for Jobs on Now
Apply for Jobs on Now
Austins School of Spa Technology
ME Online
slow aging
What Price Gold

Posted by on Nov 3 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under AfPak, Editors' Picks, Expert Opinions ME, Iraq War, Libya, Middle East Conflicts, News From the Region, War. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


To post a comment, you must login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with our site and post your comment.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Legal Notice

Comments Closed

2 Comments for “Romney’s Foreign Policy: About Face or Two-Faced?”

  1. voting is so pathetic what are the voters thinking,??? that, it matters??? that it counts???? what a forking joke, as long as everyone keeps playing their game, everyone will allways be losers, gotta stand up to be counted not cow down to a forked up system…….

  2. Romney is an absolute liar surrounded by neocons who want war on Iran. Read Justin Raimondo’s excellent article here:

Comments are closed


Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE


  1. Obama’s Failed Foreign Policy Change
  2. Scots Independents Lose Vote but Win the Fight
  3. Energy Service Company Is Hiring Veterans
  4. Scots kiss goodbye to independence
  5. Give Diplomacy With Russia a Chance
  6. Ceasefire? A hollow victory indeed
  7. Put on trial American officials loyal to Israel for treason
  8. World shares Scotland’s ‘freedom’ call
  9. That finger of Rand Paul’s is always in the wind
  10. ISIS Beheadings on Cue from Washington and London?
  11. American Establishment Combats Resurgent ‘Isolationist’ Threat
  12. Drilling Service Company Hiring Today!
  13. Available Hospital Positions Available!
  14. SPACEMAX Deployable Shelters Chosen for Remote US Military Space Fence Program
  15. City of London vs. Scottish Independence
  16. Commercial Insurance Service Company Hiring
  17. Surveillance Compliance Company Hiring Today
  18. Generating Fear through Lies and Hypocrisy: a Reply to Dershowitz’ Pathological Tirade
  19. Ted Cruz another Israeli Mouthpiece
  20. Palestinian Authority Gives Up Leverage in Favor of Israeli Fools Gold
  1. Reinhold Destremps: The above posted list is a compilation of former and current US politicians that hold a dual...
  2. Reinhold Destremps: Past and Present: 1.Attorney General – Michael Mukasey 2. Head of Homeland Security – Michael...
  3. BJ Klein: Is this the Iran News now? I thought it was about the US Vets. My mistake.
  4. winston johnson: I hate likes and people trying to sway me from my objectives. The Muslim who wrote this garbage...
  5. Debbie Menon: @ James R. Shawn is a Sniper in the IDF. Don’t expect a rational/logical response. The IDF kills...

Apply for VA Home Loan Now!

Military Veterans Radio