As independent and Latino voters flee Romney, his prospects in the general election appear dimmer as the GOP nomination grinds on.
At an event in South Carolina last year, the former Massachusetts governor, who has no background in the military, suggested he’d like to “introduce some private sector competition” into veterans’ health care, at least partially privatizing the existing system. Given the excellence of the care our veterans receive, it seemed like a bizarre thing to say. Indeed, [even] the VFW was not at all pleased.
Ordinarily, presidential candidates wouldn’t pick Veterans’ Day to annoy veterans. Mitt Romney must have missed the memo.
By Steve Benen
When reporters asked the Romney campaign to explain, his spokesperson said the Republican candidate is “only interested in providing veterans with the world-class care they deserve and reversing the defense cuts and failed policies of the Obama administration.”
None of that statement makes any sense.
Paul Krugman took on the most glaring policy problem with Romney’s approach.
This is awesome on multiple levels. First, you know what voucherization would mean in practice: the vouchers would be inadequate, and become more so over time, so that veterans who don’t make enough money to top them up would fail to receive essential care. Patriotism! …
[Editor’s Note: If this is not a disqualification for a candidate running for president, I would be personally shocked. It’s one thing to be utterly ignorant of foreign affairs like Cain; to be ignorant of basic public policy like Perry; to be a whack job like Bachman. But to propose turning our backs on our 26-million veterans right as they come home to an economy wrecked by banks and their Republican and Democratic enablers is absurd. Steve Benen is a talanted writer with whom I have some differences on policy. But when I read this headline, I thought he must have gotten the story wrong. But Benen is spot-on, and Mitt Romney should be toast.]
First, you know what voucherization would mean in practice: the vouchers would be inadequate, and become more so over time, so that veterans who don’t make enough money to top them up would fail to receive essential care. Patriotism!
Second, the VA is one of the great policy success stories of the past two decades…. So naturally Romney wants to privatize it. Because let’s remember, he’s the serious Republican.
Actually, this is quite consistent with the rest of his health care ideas. Basically, he wants to replace Medicare with Romneycare/Obamacare; this despite the fact that the only reason Romneycare/Obamacare runs through private insurers, rather than being straight single-payers, is as a political compromise. Medicare has lots of problems, but it’s more cost-effective than private insurance — as demonstrated by the utter failure of Medicare Advantage to save, as opposed to costing, money.
So, our serious Republican is committed on ideological grounds to demolishing successful programs and replacing them with conservative fantasies that have failed repeatedly in the past.
But there’s one other thing that’s worth mentioning. The campaign’s statement said Romney is committed to “reversing the defense cuts … of the Obama administration.”
I realize Romney can be a little slow when it comes to understanding the nuances of current events, so let’s make this easy to understand: Obama has increased defense spending, and an increase is the opposite of a cut.
Maybe Romney would understand this better if we put in visual form. Here are the Pentagon budgets over the last six years, with the red columns showing defense spending under Bush, and the blue columns showing defense spending under Obama.
If Romney seriously believes this shows a decrease in defense spending, he should forget about the White House and go back to elementary school.
Romney clearly wants to be taken seriously on these issues, which suggests he should probably take the time to brush up on the details. The guy’s been running for president non-stop for nearly six years, and the fact that he’s still confused about the basics isn’t encouraging.
This isn’t as funny as Rick Perry’s “brain freeze” last year but it’s arguably much more important.
Posted by VNN on January 30, 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under Medical & Health. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry